Critical Responses to Faith Development Theory: A Useful Agenda for Change?

Since it was first presented, James Fowler’s Faith Development Theory has proven influential in pastoral care/counselling, pastoral/practical theology, spiritual direction and Christian education. However, it has also been subject to substantial critical evaluation. This article reviews the major themes within psychological critiques and considers the agenda provided by these critiques for the theory’s future development. Critical themes concern Fowler’s understanding of ‘faith’; the theory’s structural ‘logic of development’; its over-emphasis on cognition and consequent lack of attention to emotional/psychodynamic dimensions as processes of transition and transformation; its gender bias and cultural specificity; and its purported difficulty in accommodating postmodern trends in psychology. To address these critiques in a meaningful way, it is proposed that there is a need to embrace alternative existing theories of faith development and spiritual/religious change, to construct a radically revised, process-focused version of Faith Development Theory, and to continue to develop new localized process models of faith development.